Top SCADA Systems Used in RNG Plants
(2026 Guide):
How Operators Choose the Right One

As RNG projects scale, operators need reliable SCADA systems to manage complex facilities.We break down the most common platforms used in the industry and how teams select them.

Turning 45Z Tax Credits into Climate Capital — Rimba
Webinar recap · Section 45Z

Turning 45Z Tax Credits into Climate Capital

A deal-maker's guide to the Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit with Faith Larson, VP of Renewables & Legal Counsel at Mickelson & Company — qualifying your fuel, navigating IRS guidance, structuring a credit sale, and closing on time.

Speaker — Faith Larson, Mickelson & Company Host — Timothy Daniel, Rimba Read — 9 min
2029
45Z extended through 2029 under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, effective since January 2025
$60B+
Transferable tax credit market expected for the 2026 tax year — 45Z alone is worth billions annually
90–94%
Historical pricing range for 45Z credit sales as a share of face value

The Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit is one of the largest transferable tax credit opportunities in the United States. In Rimba's recent webinar, "Turning 45Z Tax Credits into Climate Capital," host Timothy Daniel sat down with Faith Larson, VP of Renewables & Legal Counsel at Mickelson & Company, for a practical walkthrough of how clean fuel producers qualify for the credit, structure a sale, and get to closing. Here are the key takeaways.

0145Z at a glance: a production tax credit with staying power

Section 45Z became effective at the beginning of 2025 and — in a strong signal of policy durability — was extended through 2029 under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The credit is generated through the production and sale of clean transportation fuel: producers earn it on each gallon (or gallon-equivalent) produced and sold within the same tax year.

Eligible fuel categories span the biofuels landscape: ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, renewable natural gas (RNG), hydrogen, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) — separate industries of varying size, all capable of generating the same credit.

Project-cost-based

Investment tax credit (ITC)

Based on 30–50% of project cost (solar, wind, geothermal, storage). Carries a five-year recapture period during which the IRS can disallow some or all of the credit if the project stops meeting standards.

Production-based

45Z production tax credit

Earned at the moment a gallon of clean fuel is produced and sold. No forward-looking recapture exposure — which is exactly why corporate buyers treat it as one of the safest credits in market.

Less risk means more demand. The most active buyers are C-corporations with U.S. federal tax liability, and 45Z sits inside a 2026 transferable credit market expected to exceed $60 billion — with 45Z alone generating several billion dollars of credit value annually, potentially more than $20 billion over the program's life.

02The biggest misconceptions — and how they've evolved

Prevailing wage looked scarier than it is. Producers must pay prevailing wages not only to employees but to contractors performing work at the facility — limited to repairs and alterations for existing plants (new construction carries broader requirements). Early on, many producers questioned whether the compliance cost was worth it. In practice, the credit is often large enough — with a runway through 2029 — that the investment clearly pays off. The heavy lifting happened in 2025; producers now have processes in place, making ongoing compliance far more routine.

More producers qualify than expected. At the start of 2025, many producers doubted they could hit a qualifying emissions factor under the 45ZCF-GREET model, which differs from the models used in LCFS and other markets. Subsequent proposed regulations clarified the ability to purchase Environmental Attribute Certificates (EACs) to lower CI scores — a tool now readily available. The regulations also defined placed-in-service timing for the clean energy sources supplying EACs: a facility is considered placed in service when it can first verify and document an emissions factor of 50 or below, and EACs can be sourced from facilities placed in service up to three years prior to that date. Heading into 2026, nearly all producers should have a path to qualify.

03What it takes to qualify

Four pillars of 45Z qualification
1

Produce a transportation fuel

Or a fuel suitable for use as a transportation fuel — across ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, RNG, hydrogen, and SAF.

2

Make a qualified sale

Sold for use in a fuel mixture, or to a person for use in a trade or business — including through third-party aggregators and marketers.

3

Operate a qualified facility

The production facility itself must meet the statute's requirements to generate the credit.

4

Register as a clean fuel producer

IRS Form 637 registration, approved before production — there is no retroactive path for fuel produced without it.

On registration, Larson was unequivocal: there is no retroactive fix. Form 637 registration needed to be submitted by roughly July 1, 2024 to guarantee eligibility from January 1, 2025 — fuel produced before an approved registration cannot recover 45Z eligibility after the fact. Submit early, receive approval, then produce.

The qualified sale requirement carried early drama. Draft language attached to Treasury's initial notice added three words — "as a fuel" — to the trade-or-business sale bucket, creating confusion in a market where producers routinely sell through third-party intermediaries who aggregate and market biofuel on their behalf rather than directly to blenders. The proposed regulations issued the needed technical correction removing that language, and Treasury has granted reliance on those regulations. The regs also provide a form certification for qualified sales that offers a safe harbor for 2026 and beyond.

04Structuring and closing a credit transfer

Assemble your advisors. A CPA or law firm supports validation via a tax credit eligibility memo or tax opinion. A tax credit broker markets your credits to corporate buyers matched on size, timing, and tax year — calendar versus fiscal year matters a great deal. Your third-party verifier produces the CI verification report, which carries an IRS safe harbor when performed by a qualified verifier. Prevailing wage documentation rounds out the core diligence package.

Negotiate the term sheet. The term sheet sets the terms you'd accept: pricing (historically 90–94% of face value, with roughly 93.5% the high-water mark for 45Z), whether tax credit insurance is required or an indemnity suffices, credit size, and funding structure. Every seller provides an indemnity — typically no-fault, meaning if the IRS disallows the credit, the seller makes the buyer whole — and an indemnity is only as good as the seller's creditworthiness. Buyers bring their own "buy box" defining acceptable risk and pricing.

Why buyers love the structure

Quarterly funding makes 45Z shine. Deals are commonly structured to tranche production quarterly, funded against the buyer's estimated tax payment dates — April 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15 for calendar-year taxpayers. Buyers align cash going out with the tax benefit coming in, a structure Larson called highly attractive to corporate purchasers.

Close the transfer. The producer applies to the IRS for a registration number that ties seller and buyer together. Both parties file a transfer election statement with their tax returns to evidence the transfer and the claim. Definitive documents are signed following due diligence, and multi-year or quarterly structures continue from there.

05Realistic timelines

Larson's guidance on planning: engage advisors as early as possible. 2025 saw a massive industry-wide catch-up on prevailing wage compliance — some producers were still completing 2025 compliance work in April 2026 — and advisors serving the biofuels industry face the same capacity constraints.

~30d

Prepare and go to market

Line up advisors and get document drafts moving. Marketing memos can turn within a week of engagement, but producers need time to prepare for what the process entails.

1–2w

Term sheet negotiation

Once a buyer submits an offer, term sheet negotiation typically runs a week — sometimes two — and locks in an exclusivity period to reach closing.

30–45d

Transfer agreement and diligence

Negotiating the tax credit transfer agreement and completing buyer due diligence runs 30–45 days or more. Tax credit insurance adds a parallel track — about a week for indications of interest, then two to three weeks of carrier diligence — and the policy must be negotiated alongside the transfer agreement, since coverage gaps in one may be filled by the other.

All-in: anywhere from 30 days to 60–90+ depending on documentation readiness and whether insurance is required. Deals have closed in a matter of weeks when sellers were prepared — and stretched past 90 days when they weren't.

06Feedstock eligibility after OBBBA

Several rules are now clear. Fuel produced in 2026 and beyond must use feedstocks grown and sourced in the United States, Canada, or Mexico. Only manure-based feedstocks may carry a negative CI — currently capped at −51 under the existing GREET model, even though OBBBA and the regulations allow for much deeper negative values (real-world measurements often land between roughly −250 and −350). An updated GREET model is anticipated that may unlock those deeper scores.

Open items remain. The industry is waiting on removal of the indirect land use change penalty — highly consequential for corn and for soybean oil inputs into biodiesel and renewable diesel. And there is currently no provisional emissions rate (PER) process: pathways exist for manure-based feedstocks, landfill gas, and wastewater, but producers using organic food waste are still waiting for a pathway.

One new diligence layer applies market-wide: foreign entity of concern (FEOC) and prohibited foreign entity restrictions. Diligence now runs in both directions — buyers vet sellers as always, but sellers must also confirm their buyer is not a prohibited foreign entity. Larson noted 45Z carries less FEOC exposure than credits like solar, wind, or Section 45X advanced manufacturing — one reason 45Z continues to elevate as one of the most attractive credits for 2026.

07How the credit math works

The credit equals gallons produced and sold, multiplied by the emissions factor — calculated as (50 kg CO2e per mmBTU minus the fuel's emissions rate) divided by 50 — multiplied by the applicable amount ($1.00 per gallon where prevailing wage is satisfied) with an annual inflation adjustment ($1.06 for 2025).

For producers just starting out, the threshold question is whether the facility can reach an emissions rate of roughly 47.5 or below — the band where credit generation begins. Levers include getting the CI model inputs right, purchasing EACs, bringing RNG into the facility to displace natural gas, and investments like combined heat and power, carbon sequestration, or pipeline interconnection. Most producers already have a verifier or consultant relationship from LCFS and other compliance markets — the same relationship can carry into 45Z.

In practice, CI runs on a rolling basis. For quarterly-funded deals, the verifier affirms CI on cumulative production data — January through March for the first funding, January through June for the second, and so on — smoothing out swings (say, from mid-year sequestration coming online) so the final annual CI holds no surprises. The intensive verification comes at year-end, when the verifier audits utility consumption against invoices and issues the certified report required for the IRS safe harbor. That CI applies to that year only; the process repeats annually through the life of the credit.

08Documentation is the deal

Asked about the most common diligence gaps, Larson pointed back to 2025's prevailing wage delays — compounded by OBBBA's July timing, which pushed most 2025 fundings into September and December. The fix is process: transfer agreements now build in a funding notice (or purchase notice) delivered typically 5–10 days before each estimated payment date, containing a prevailing wage compliance report for the period, a short-form CI verification report, the estimated credit amount, and continued representations — a truncated documentation packet that lets the buyer wire funds with confidence.

"It's important that we underwrite, that we provide very safe, very well-diligenced credits with the strongest documentation. That is our path forward."

Faith Larson · Mickelson & Company

Her closing outlook: pricing should hold in the 90–92% range, though with $60 billion+ in transferable credits hitting the 2026 market and corporate tax capacity compressed by other OBBBA provisions, well-documented, well-diligenced credits will command the premium.

Top SCADA Systems Used in RNG Plants

FactoryTalk (Rockwell Automation)

FactoryTalk is one of the most widely used SCADA platforms in North American industrial automation.
Many RNG plants rely on Allen-Bradley PLCs, making FactoryTalk a natural choice due to its tight integration with Rockwell control hardware.

Why Operators use it:
  • strong industrial automation ecosystem
  • large integrator network
  • common in gas processing and manufacturing plants

Ignition (Inductive Automation)

Ignition has rapidly become one of the fastest-growing SCADA platforms in the industrial automation sector.
Unlike traditional SCADA systems, Ignition is built around web-based architecture, making it well suited for remote monitoring and multi-site operations.

Key points:
  • web-based dashboards
  • flexible integrations
  • scalable licensing model

GE Vernova – iFIX / Proficy

GE’s iFIX platform has long been used in industrial process monitoring.
In RNG facilities, it is often deployed in plants that require strong data historian capabilities and integration with existing industrial automation infrastructure.

Typical use cases include:
  • large anaerobic digestion facilities
  • industrial gas processing plants
  • complex upgrading systems

Siemens WinCC / PCS7

GE’s iFIX platform has long been used in industrial process monitoring.
In RNG facilities, it is often deployed in plants that require strong data historian capabilities and integration with existing industrial automation infrastructure.

These systems are commonly found in:
  • municipal digesters
  • large wastewater facilities
  • industrial RNG processing plants

Wonderware (Aveva)

AVEVA’s System Platform (formerly Wonderware) is widely deployed in industrial automation environments.
The platform is known for strong visualization and process monitoring capabilities, making it common in facilities that require detailed operational dashboards.

Typical deployments include:
  • wastewater treatment plants
  • landfill gas facilities
  • industrial biogas plants

VTScada

VTScada is frequently used in infrastructure monitoring environments such as water utilities and gas distribution networks.
Some RNG operators deploy VTScada for remote monitoring of distributed digester systems.

Strengths include:
  • reliable alarm management
  • remote telemetry monitoring
  • scalable infrastructure monitoring

How RNG Operators Choose a SCADA System

Selecting the right SCADA platform for an RNG facility depends on several operational and technical factors. While most SCADA systems provide similar core functionality, operators typically prioritize compatibility, scalability, and data accessibility.

PLC Compatibility

Most RNG plants rely on programmable logic controllers (PLCs) to control equipment such as digesters, gas upgrading systems, compressors, and pipeline injection infrastructure.

Common PLC platforms include:

Multi-Site Monitoring

As RNG portfolios expand, many operators manage multiple facilities across different regions.
In these cases, centralized monitoring becomes increasingly important. Platforms such as Ignition and FactoryTalk are commonly used to monitor multiple RNG plants from a single operations center.

This allows operators to:

Ease of Operation

Operators often spend hours each day interacting with SCADA screens, especially in facilities where digesters, upgrading systems, and compressors must be monitored continuously. When interfaces are poorly designed or cluttered, it becomes much harder to identify problems quickly.

Good SCADA deployments typically prioritize:

The Future of RNG Operations Software

The RNG industry is still relatively early in its digital transformation.

Most facilities today rely heavily on SCADA systems that were originally designed for industrial process control, not for portfolio-level operational insight.

As operators scale to dozens of plants, a new category of software is beginning to emerge on top of SCADA systems.

These platforms focus on:

  • methane yield optimization
  • carbon intensity (CI) tracking
  • cross-facility performance monitoring
  • predictive maintenance

Rather than replacing SCADA, these tools use SCADA data to provide higher-level operational intelligence across multiple plants.

For operators managing growing RNG portfolios, this additional software layer is becoming increasingly important.